Susan Cutter and colleagues in the assigned journal article for this module advocated for the Federal Government to reduce the level of guaranteed coverage of public losses in a disaster from the current level of 75% and moving toward new policies that gave those moving in to high hazard areas (ie. South Florida’s seashores or California’s wooded mountain communities) a greater role in covering the financial costs and risks. The authors pointed to the National Flood Insurance Program as a model policy that required limited Federal funds and had been constructed to consider the capacity to pay in the setting of the insurance rates.
As the globe appears headed in to a period of greater natural disasters, do you support Cutter’s proposal or do you think that the Federal taxpayer covering 75% or more of the recovery cost is the appropriate level?
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more