MGT603_Assess 3 Written Report Page 1 of 8 ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT603: Systems Thinking Assessment Written Report Individual/Group Individual Length Up to 2000 words Learning Outcomes c) Analyse, select and apply systems modelling tools in integrating, optimising and enhancing business processes within contemporary organisations. d) Synthesise technological and non-technological solutions to business problems that promote integration and that optimise whole-of-enterprise operations Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 6.2 (week 6) For intensive
View complete question MGT603_Assess 3 Written Report Page 1 of 8 ASSESSMENT 3 BRIEF Subject Code and Title MGT603: Systems Thinking Assessment Written Report Individual/Group Individual Length Up to 2000 words Learning Outcomes c) Analyse, select and apply systems modelling tools in integrating, optimising and enhancing business processes within contemporary organisations. d) Synthesise technological and non-technological solutions to business problems that promote integration and that optimise whole-of-enterprise operations Submission By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 6.2 (week 6) For intensive class: By 11:55pm AEST/AEDT Friday of Module 6.2 (week 6) Weighting 40% Total Marks 40 marks Context: There are two approaches towards improving systems, short-term approaches that normally addresses the symptoms and rarely help understand and address the cause of the problem, and long-term approaches, which allow managers to address the real cause(s) of the problem. In this assessment, students will try to solve a practical problem by using Systems Thinking tools called System Archetypes combined with value stream mapping. Instructions: Assessment 3 is about uncovering the complexities in operations management generally, identifying key themes, intended and unintended consequences and proposing a holistic solution to the problem using a Systems Thinking lens. The following scenario study provides you with a brief overview of a hypothetical problem. Be aware that the scenario provided may not cover every detail that you will need to address in the Written Report, in which case, you will need to conduct additional research, including further research on how emergency departments function in any hospital. Scenario Overview: MGT603_Assess 3 Written Report Page 2 of 8 Consider yourself as part of a team responsible for managing the operations of an emergency department of a public hospital. The emergency department has received feedback from patients suggesting that the patient wait times need to be improved. The value stream map of the current operations is shown in the attached diagram. (LMS please attach value stream map here ) You have been tasked with improving patient turnaround time by reducing the current time to half. To complete the task you are required to identify the various System Archetypes that affect the operations of the hospital and the emergency department itself and based on the archetypes, develop a future State Value Stream Map of the emergency department. It is recommended that you identify and critically analyse intended and unintended consequences, recommending holistic solutions that will optimise the operations of the emergency department without compromising the performance of other functions of the hospital. Suggested format Your Written Report should include the following Executive Summary Table of Contents Introduction/Background Body o Identification and analysis of the System Archetypes that may impede performance o Analysis of the current State Value Stream Map of the emergency department based on System Archetypes o Recommended new State Value Stream Map with desired reduction in patient turnaround time. o Discussions on intended and unintended consequences of the modified system. Conclusion Recommendations References Appendices Submission Instructions: This Written Report is to be written according to academic writing guidelines and must be submitted in compliance with the following; 1. You should make significant references to the subject material and substantial wider reading. A minimum five (5) academic (books & peer-reviewed journal articles) & MGT603_Assess 3 Written Report Page 3 of 8 two (2) other sources (newspaper article, trade publications, websites, etc.) must be used. These should be referenced in the APA style, both in-text and in a reference list. References to Wikipedia or similar unsubstantiated sources will not be accepted. 2. The assignment is to include in-text citations and a reference list following the latest APA referencing style. The APA referencing guide can be located in the Academic Writing Guide at http://library.think.edu.au/ld.php?content_id=1882254 3. Submit Written Report (with references) via the Assessment link in the main navigation menu in MGT603 Systems thinking on the Student Portal. The Learning Facilitator will provide feedback via Grade Centre in the Student Portal. Feedback can be viewed in My Grades. Students should use the brief to guide what to include in the assessment and the following rubric to inform the standard required. Assessment 3 Finalized.Docx Page 4 of 8 MGT603_Assess 3 Written Report Page 5 of 8 Learning Rubric: MGT603 Systems Thinking Assessment 3 Written Report Assessment Attributes Fail (Unacceptable) Pass (Functional) Credit (Proficient) Distinction (Advanced) High Distinction (Exceptional) Understanding of research principles and methods applicable to MBA Percentage for this criterion 20% The focus for the research question(s) or basis for the project is unclear. The rationale for the research methodology is inappropriate for the research question/project. The focus for the research question(s) or basis for project is adequately clear. The rationale for the research methodology is appropriate for the research question/project. The focus for the research question(s) or basis for project is clear. The rationale for the research methodology is stated and appropriate for the research question/project. The focus for the research question(s) or basis for project is very clear. The rationale for the research methodology is compared with alternatives and the chosen method is appropriate for the research question/project. The focus for the research question(s) or basis for project is exceptionally clear. The rationale for the research methodology is critically compared and evaluated against alternatives and the chosen method is appropriate for the research question/project. Knowledge and understanding (technical and theoretical knowledge). Understands theoretical models and concepts and tools and techniques of systems thinking and their applications to operations Limited understanding of required concepts and knowledge Key components of the assignment are not addressed. No discussion on systems principles and tools such as system dynamic, system archetypes, causal loop diagrams. Lack of understanding and application of value stream Knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline. Resembles a recall or summary of key ideas. Often confuses assertion of personal opinion with information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials on systems principles and tools such as system dynamic, system Thorough knowledge or understanding of the field or discipline/s. Supports personal opinion and information substantiated by evidence from the research/course materials. Demonstrates a capacity to explain and apply relevant concepts of systems principles Highly developed understanding of the field or discipline/s. Discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course materials and extended reading. Well demonstrated capacity to explain and A sophisticated understanding of the field or discipline/s. Systematically and critically discriminates between assertion of personal opinion and information substantiated by robust evidence from the research/course MGT603_Assess 3 Written Report Page 6 of 8 management practices Percentage for this criterion 30% mapping to operations management decision making archetypes, causal loop diagrams. Lack of clear understanding and application of value stream mapping to operations management decision making and tools such as system dynamic, system archetypes, causal loop diagrams. Demonstrates understanding and application of value stream mapping apply relevant concepts of systems principles and tools such as system dynamic, system archetypes, causal loop diagrams. Demonstrates good understanding and application of value stream mapping materials and extended reading. Mastery of concepts and application to new situations/further Learning of systems principles and tools such as system dynamic, system archetypes, causal loop diagrams. Demonstrates excellent understanding and application of value stream mapping Effective Written Communication Percentage for this criterion 15% Difficult to understand for audience, no logical/clear structure, poor flow of ideas, argument lacks supporting evidence. Audience cannot follow the line of reasoning. Information, arguments and evidence are presented in a way that is not always clear and logical. Line of reasoning is often difficult to follow. Information, arguments and evidence are well presented, mostly clear flow of ideas and arguments. Line of reasoning is easy to follow. Information, arguments and evidence are very well presented; the presentation is logical, clear and well supported by evidence. Demonstrates cultural sensitivity. Expertly presented; the presentation is logical, persuasive, and well supported by evidence, demonstrating a clear flow of ideas and arguments. Engages and sustains audiences interest in MGT603_Assess 3 Written Report Page 7 of 8 the topic, demonstrates high levels of cultural sensitivity Effective use of diverse presentation aids, including graphics and multimedia. Analysis and application with synthesis of new knowledge Percentage for this criterion 25% Limited synthesis and analysis. Limited application/recommendations based upon analysis. Demonstrated analysis and synthesis of new knowledge with application. Shows the ability to interpret relevant information and literature. Well-developed analysis and synthesis with application of recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis. Thoroughly developed and creative analysis and synthesis with application of pretested models and / or independently developed models and justified recommendations linked to analysis/synthesis. Highly sophisticated and creative analysis, synthesis of new with existing knowledge. Strong application by way of pretested models and / or independently developed models. Recommendations are clearly justified based on the analysis/synthesis. Applying knowledge to new situations/other cases. MGT603_Assess 3 Written Report Page 8 of 8 Correct citation of key resources and evidence Percentage for this criterion 10% Demonstrates inconsistent use of resources to support and develop ideas. Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. Demonstrates use of high quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Demonstrates use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop statements. Shows evidence of wide scope for sourcing evidence. Demonstrates use of high-quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop statements. Shows evidence of wide scope for sourcing evidence.

View less

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more