Advanced Roles Paper Rubric Advanced Roles Paper Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This

Advanced Roles Paper Rubric
Advanced Roles Paper Rubric
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization
10 to >8.0 pts
Exceptional
Exceptional and logical sequence of the paper; use of transition sentences demonstrates an understanding of the relationship among content
8 to >6.0 pts
Effective
Sequence of the paper could be improved; content shared shows effective understanding of the relationship between sources
6 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Sequence of paper seems to be out of logical sequence; evaluation of all articles does not flow
0 pts
Unacceptable
Paragraphs are out of order; evaluation of paper content follows an illogical pattern throughout the assignment OR student did not submit the assignment
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSource Quality
10 to >8.0 pts
Exceptional
Required number of sources (at least 3-4 outside course sources); all outside course scholarly sources from nursing education or related nursing journals
8 to >6.0 pts
Effective
Required number of sources (at least 3-4 outside course sources; nearly all scholarly sources from nursing journals
6 to >0.0 pts
Developing
Fewer than required number of sources; only one or two scholarly nursing journal sources
0 pts
Unacceptable
Sources are not relevant to researcher’s topic; sources necessitate extensive additional research OR student did not submit the assignment
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar & Mechanics
5 pts
Exceptional
There are no errors in spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, and punctuation; personal pronouns are not used
4 pts
Effective
There are less than 2 errors in spelling, grammar, word usage, punctuation, and personal pronoun usage
2 pts
Developing
More than 4 errors in spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, punctuation, and personal pronoun usage
0 pts
Unacceptable
Severe issues in spelling, grammar, word order, word usage, punctuation, and personal pronoun usage OR student did not submit the assignment
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format: Title Page, In-Text Citations, Bibliography
10 pts
Exceptional
All citations are correctly cited following a standard bibliographic format; follows APA guidelines; no APA errors noted
8 pts
Effective
All citations are cited following a standard bibliographic format; 1-2 APA errors are noted
6 pts
Developing
5-6 APA errors evident
0 pts
Unacceptable
Sources do not have a proper APA citation; lack of APA guidelines for references OR student did not submit the assignment
10 pts
 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
CSLO 1
threshold: 3.0 pts
5 pts
Exceptional: Introduction provides excellent context for the assignment, addressing future MSN role, role expectations, and competencies
4 pts
Effective: Introduction provides effective context for the rest of the assignment; brief discussion of role expectations and competencies
2 pts
Developing: Introduction provides minimal context for the assignment; limited discussion of role expectations and competencies
0 pts
Unacceptable: Introduction does not provide context for the assignment OR no introduction was provided OR student did not submit the assignment
5 pts
 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Benner’s Theory
CSLO 1
threshold: 16.0 pts
20 pts
Exceptional: Succinctly and comprehensively describes steps of applying Benner’s Theory during role transition
18 pts
Effective: Briefly describes steps of applying Benner’s Theory during role transition
16 pts
Developing: Limited discussion or vague outline and discussion of Benner’s Theory during role transition
0 pts
Unacceptable: Discussion of Benner’s Theory absent OR student did not submit the assignment
20 pts
 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Practice Issue/Care Delivery Problem
CSLO 2
threshold: 7.0 pts
10 pts
Exceptional: Exceptionally well-presented practice issue/care delivery problem; clearly explains why the issue was chosen; demonstrates a clear understanding of the need for MSN role involvement
8 pts
Effective: Mostly explains the practice issue/care delivery problem; briefly addresses why issue was chosen; demonstrates understanding of the need for MSN role involvement
6 pts
Developing: Description of issue/care delivery problem; lacks an explanation of why it was chosen; demonstrates little understanding regarding the need for MSN role involvement
0 pts
Unacceptable: Does not explain why the issue was chosen; demonstrates no understanding of MSN role involvement OR student did not submit the assignment
10 pts
 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEthics Application
CSLO 1
threshold: 7.0 pts
10 pts
Exceptional: Clearly, exceptionally identifies actual or potential ethics relating to selected issue; includes logical steps MSN prepared nurse would take to address identified ethical considerations
8 pts
Effective: Effective identification of actual/potential ethical considerations; briefly addresses steps for MSN leadership
6 pts
Developing: Limited discussion of actual/potential ethical issues; missing description of steps for MSN leadership
0 pts
Unacceptable: Fails to address actual or potential ethical issues and MSN leadership relating to selected issue/problem OR student did not submit the assignment
10 pts
 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApplication of Master’s Essentials
CSLO 2
threshold: 17.0 pts
20 pts
Exceptional: Selects and discusses at least 3-4 Master’s Essentials; provides a clear description of relationship between Master’s Essentials and selected issue
18 pts
Effective: Selects and discusses 2 Master’s Essentials; provides a limited description of relationship between Master’s Essentials and selected issue
16 pts
Developing: Selects and discusses 1 Master’s Essentials; no description of relationship between Master’s Essentials and selected issue
0 pts
Unacceptable: Fails to identify or address the relationship between the chosen issue and the Master’s Essentials OR student did not submit the assignment
20 pts
Total Points: 100
PreviousNext

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more