Primary Post Discussion Questions (Part 1-answer all discussion questions thoroughly):
Ethics of Algorithms- datasets, data points, and data privacy (500 words).
Listen to Open Mike Eagle’s song “Dark Comedy Morning Show.” Do you agree or disagree that a “whole ‘nother labor force” will be required to spot, see, or recognize our habits to make use of them to predict and influence our behavior, choices, and spending habits? Why or why not? Cite Tom Jokinen and Charles Duhigg in your considered response to this question regarding the labor force required to make meaningful use of large datasets.
What opaque boxes has Netflix, Target, YouTube, Amazon, Google, Facebook, Procter &
Gamble, Starbucks, Spotify, the University of Arizona, etc. placed you into? Offer a description of how two of the above behemoths “sees” you and what two of these companies or organizations thinks you are like. How do you feel about corporations, organizations, or even hiring managers knowing most, if not all, of your demographic information, your internet search activities, and your daily habits to then “camouflage” how much they know about you so as to not “spook” you with overly precise recommendations, attention, coupons, suggestions, newsfeeds, or advertising (Duhigg)?
Describe online or other advertising or recommendations you have received that have surprised you or otherwise caused you some alarm or trepidation. Consider the father who had to call to apologize to the Target store manager because the analytics and/or data science information gathered about his daughter’s reproductive health was more prescient, in terms of what was occurring under his roof, than he was. Has the knowledge of the neighborhood shopkeeper from 100 years ago, pre-WWI, been outstripped by business intelligence in the 21st century?
Important Notes:
Remember that high quality academic and reflective writing is required in all of your posts, which should be spell-checked, semi-formal, and well organized. Spell-checking is an enabled D2L feature (abc V), as is editing your posts.
There is an emphasis on quality posts over a large quantity of posts.
If it is apparent, from your primary post, that you have not engaged thoroughly with the required and assigned course reading for 2.9 you will not receive full credit for your primary post. You should cite and engage with Tom Jokinen, Adrienne LaFrance, Will Oremus, and Charles Duhigg, in your primary post this week.
Note: you must answer all five questions (1-5) fully and should plan to write 500 words in your primary post and 100 words in each secondary post to receive full credit for this assignment.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.
Read moreEach paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.
Read moreThanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.
Read moreYour email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.
Read moreBy sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.
Read more