Describe the worst job Describe the worst job you have ever had. Any kind of work experience…

Critical Response Essay Your Assignment: 1. the text: Postrel, V. (2007). The Truth About Beauty. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2007/03/the-truth-about-beauty/305620/ 2. Compose a 750-word thesis-driven essay about what you appreciated and/ or found problematic about the text and the authors appeals to logic, credibility, and emotions. Keep in mind that your Critical Response Essay will focus on one topic (although you may take a different angle or offer a different perspective), so this may inform what you appreciate and/ or found
View complete question Critical Response Essay Your Assignment: 1. the text: Postrel, V. (2007). The Truth About Beauty. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2007/03/the-truth-about-beauty/305620/ 2. Compose a 750-word thesis-driven essay about what you appreciated and/ or found problematic about the text and the authors appeals to logic, credibility, and emotions. Keep in mind that your Critical Response Essay will focus on one topic (although you may take a different angle or offer a different perspective), so this may inform what you appreciate and/ or found problematic about the text. In your essay, support your critique (praise and/ or criticism) of the authors appeals by analyzing relevant examples from the text. As well, logically justify and explain your critique of the text and the authors appeals. Your goal is to persuade your audience to agree with your analysis and evaluation. Requirements: Focus and Organization Your introduction paragraph must clearly state your argument (thesis), which will state what you appreciated and / or found problematic about the authors appeals to logic, credibility, and emotions. Your body paragraphs must logically support and justify your thesis. In other words, you must have a focused critique (praise and/ or criticism) that you prove and defend throughout your essay. Analysis and Development In your body paragraphs, analyze and logically explain what you appreciated and/ or found problematic about authors appeal(s) to logic, credibility, and emotions Support your critique with an analysis of relevant examples from the text. Justify and explain your critique of the text and the authors appeals. Style, Grammar, and APA Communicate your critique in clear, audience-and-purpose appropriate language. Communicate your critique without grammar, spelling, and mechanical errors. Correctly use the APA documentation style to format your essay and cite your sources.
Critical Analysis Essay Success Criteria: The following features are the success criteria for this assignment. Please see below for the rubric, which also details how you will be marked: Is approximately 750 words 5 paragraphs in total (see structure on p. 3-4) Formal tone (no slang, no clich_ colloquialism) Can include the use of I (use sparingly and appropriately) Includes fair, logical, and insightful analyses/evaluations of the text Evidence is mainly incorporated as paraphrases; no long quotations (40 words or more) allowed Follows APA referencing and formatting (Reference page, title page, Times New Roman, font size 12, double-spaced, 1-inch margins, headers). Critical Analysis Essay Structure: Introduction: Hook your audience by introducing the topic and controversial issue. What is the controversy? Why is the contentious issue significant? Thesis Statement: Your thesis statement is your evaluation (support and/or critique) of the text. Your thesis statement must clearly answer the following question: What do you support and/or find problematic with the authors appeals to logic, credibility and emotion? Body Paragraph 1 Analysis of text Rhetorical Appeal #1: Follow the evidence-analysis text structure to answer the following question: To what degree does the author effectively use one rhetorical strategy to successfully persuade you to agree with their thesis? Examine and evaluate their use of logos OR pathos OR ethos to achieve their goal or purpose. Provide evidence from the text to justify your analysis. To persuade me of your evaluation, you must provide specific evidence from the text (quote or paraphrase) and explain your evidence. Body Paragraph 2 Analysis of the text Rhetorical Appeal #2: Follow the evidence-analysis text structure to answer the following question: To what degree does the author effectively use one rhetorical strategy to successfully persuade you to agree with their thesis? Examine and evaluate their use of logos OR pathos OR ethos to achieve their goal or purpose. Provide evidence from the text to justify your analysis. To persuade me of your evaluation, you must provide specific evidence from the text (quote or paraphrase) and explain your evidence. Body Paragraph 3 Analysis of the text Rhetorical Appeal #3 OR Further evidence to support Rhetorical Appeal #1 or #2 Follow the evidence-analysis text structure to answer the following question: To what degree does the author effectively use one rhetorical strategy to successfully persuade you to agree with their thesis? Examine and evaluate their use of logos OR pathos OR ethos to achieve their goal or purpose. Provide evidence from the text to justify your analysis. To persuade me of your evaluation, you must provide specific evidence from the text (quote or paraphrase) and explain your evidence. Conclusion: Restate your thesis. Highlight key points presented (summary of your Body paragraphs). Final remarks about how this text has influenced your perspective on this topic moving forward. Major Assessment 1 Critical Response Essay Rubric (Detailed) Focus and Organization: 30% Superior/ Advanced (Wow!: 85-100%) Good (On Target: 61-84%) Fair (Near Target: 41-60%) Basic (Not Yet: 20-40%) INC Thesis Statement/Main Message is a clear, focused, specific, and creative arguable claim. Assignment is logically organized and unified; the logical connection between content and Thesis Statement/Main Message is clear. Text content on which the analysis is based is accurately interpreted. Thesis Statement/Main Message is a clear, focused, and specific arguable claim. Assignment is mostly logically organized and unified; the logical connection between content and Thesis Statement/Main Message is mostly clear. Text content on which the analysis is based is mostly accurately interpreted. Thesis Statement/Main Message is somewhat clear, focused, and specific; Thesis Statement/Main Message is not an arguable claim or lacks clear direction. Assignment is somewhat logically organized and unified; the logical connection between content and Thesis Statement/Main Message is somewhat clear. Text content on which the analysis is based is somewhat accurately interpreted Thesis Statement/Main Message is not clear, focused, specific, or arguable. Assignment is not logically organized or unified; the logical connection between content and Thesis Statement/Main Message is unclear. Text content on which the analysis is based is not accurately interpreted Incomplete 10————-9.3———-8.5 8.4————-7.3———-6.1 6.0————-5.0———-4.1 4.0————-3.0———-2.0 See Prof Critical Analysis: 30% Superior/ Advanced (Wow!: 85-100%) Good (On Target: 61-84%) Fair (Near Target: 41-60%) Basic (Not Yet: 20-40%) INC Student clearly identifies aspects of text to analyze. Students response is critically and logically explained through analysis that is relevant, creative, and thorough. Student's identification of aspects of text to analyze ismostlyclear. Students response is critically and logically explained through analysis that is mostly relevant and thorough. Student's identification of aspects of text to analyze issomewhatclear. Students response is somewhat critically and logically explained through analysis that has some relevance and is somewhat thorough. Student does not clearly identify aspects of text to analyze. Students response is not critically or logically explained; analysis is not relevant or thorough or is missing. Incomplete 10————-9.3———-8.5 8.4————7.3———6.1 6.0————5.0———4.1 4.0————-3.0———-2.0 See Prof Style: 10% Superior/ Advanced (Wow!: 85-100%) Good (On Target: 61-84%) Fair (Near Target: 41-60%) Basic (Not Yet: 20-40%) INC Language is clear, accurate, concise, and creative. Language and tone are audience- and purpose-appropriate. Quotations and paraphrases from sources are effectively and seamlessly integrated. Sentences are varied and engaging. Language is mostly clear, accurate, and concise. Language and tone are mostly audience- and purpose-appropriate. Quotations and paraphrases are mostly effectively integrated. Sentences are mostly varied and engaging. Language is somewhat clear, accurate, and concise. Language and tone are somewhat audience- and purpose-appropriate. Some effective integration of quotations and paraphrases. Sentences are somewhat varied and engaging. Language is mostly unclear, inaccurate, and not concise. Language and tone are not audience- and purpose-appropriate. Few effectively integrated quotations and paraphrases. Sentences are not varied or engaging. Incomplete 10————-9.3———-8.5 8.4————7.3———6.1 6.0————5.0———4.1 4.0————-3.0———-2.0 See Prof Grammar and Mechanics: 15% Superior/ Advanced (Wow!: 85-100%) Good (On Target: 61-84%) Fair (Near Target: 41-60%) Basic (Not Yet: 20-40%) INC Free of grammar and spelling errors. Free of mechanical errors. Very few grammar and spelling errors. Very few mechanical errors (fragments, comma splices, run-ons, misuse of punctuation). Some grammar and spelling errors. Some mechanical errors (fragments, comma splices, run-ons, misuse of punctuation). Many grammar and spelling errors. Many mechanical errors (fragments, comma splices, run-ons, misuse of punctuation). Incomplete 10————-9.3———-8.5 8.4————7.3———6.1 6.0————5.0———4.1 4.0————-3.0———-2.0 See Prof APA Referencing: 15% Superior/ Advanced (Wow!: 85-100%) Good (On Target: 61-84%) Fair (Near Target: 41-60%) Basic (Not Yet: 20-40%) INC In-text citations for quotations and paraphrases are consistently correct. APA references are completely correct. Format requirements are consistently correct. In-text citations for quotations and paraphrases are mostly correct. APA references are mostly correct. Format requirements are mostly correct. In-text citations for quotations and paraphrases are somewhat correct. APA references are somewhat correct. Format requirements are somewhat correct. In-text citations for quotations are mostly incorrect. APA references are mostly incorrect. Format requirements are mostly incorrect. Incomplete 10————-9.3———-8.5 8.4————7.3———6.1 6.0————5.0———4.1 4.0————-3.0———-2.0 See Prof

View less

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more