For the assignment (also posted in Course Content for Week 8), as before, I would like you to write a short essay of 1000 to 1200 words (in Times New Roman -12 point font, 1.5 spacing, with a Title at the beginning, and a Works Cited page at the end).
Again, you will be required to take a position on one (or two) of the philosophers that we have examined in this second part of the course.
What this means is that you can write your paper on one of the following philosophers from Part II of the course:
1. Arthur Schopenhauer (On the Suffering of the World)
2. John Stuart Mill (Utilitarianism)
3. Paulo Freire (Pedagogy of the Oppressed)
Or, you can compare two of these philosophers ethical theories:
1. Mill and Schopenhauer (on happiness, on suffering.)
2. Freire and Mill (pedagogy of the oppressed, utilitarianism.)
3. Freire and Schopenhauer (the oppressed, suffering, etc.).
Like before, the main point of the assignment is that you take a position in your essay on the reading(s).
In close detail, and from the texts that we have examined, clearly and accurately describe the ethical theories of the philosopher (or philosophers) that you have decided to write about.
And also, tell me why you agree or disagree with the ethical theory (or theories) as it relates to the theme of Ethics and Society. (You may agree with some aspects of a philosophers ethics, but disagree with others. Or you may entirely agree or disagree with their main ethical theory).
Also in your paper, as before, argue for the applicability (or inapplicability) of the ethical theory (or theories) in the world today, and in our contemporary society. For example, what can these theories help to teach us about ethics and society, when confronted with the problems that we face today?
Above all, as you were required to do in your previous paper, take a clear argumentative position, and argue for it convincingly throughout your essay.
Suggested Questions and Topics:
As before, you are free to develop your own original topic for the essay, as it relates to the philosophers and the readings we have examined in this second part of the course.
You are also free to bring back certain theories or ideas from the first part of the course, if they will help to strengthen your main thesis. (For example, Epicurus in relation to Mill and/or Schopenhauer on happiness and suffering. Or, Plato in relation to Freire – on education and liberation, are at least two possible subjects to explore further).
Here ere are two suggested essay topics that may help to guide you with the assignment. Each suggested topic relates to the following questions:
How can we best address and alleviate human suffering?
And also, Is there an ethical duty to do so?
1. (Mills Utilitarianism)
The theme of human suffering is central to John Stuart Mills Utilitarianism (1861). How does his theory of utilitarianism address human suffering? How does he propose to resolve it, or at least to improve upon this problem in society? What is the role of the individual in Mills theory? How do ethics and morality affect the decisions of both individuals and groups in Mills theory? Finally, we know that since its publication in 1861, Mills theory has inspired many governments around the world to act and govern according to its main principles (especially, governments that see themselves as democratic and liberal in the classical sense). But is it possible to actually put Mills theories into practice? Is anyone ever excluded or left behind if we do so? And also, what are the main ethical consequences of a utilitarian society? Most importantly, do you agree or disagree with Mills theory for an ethics of society?
(Use examples from the text to support your arguments).
2. (Freires Pedagogy of the Oppressed)
As you know, the theme of suffering is also central to Paulo Freires Pedagogy of the Oppressed (1968). How does Freire address and examine human suffering in his book? What are the conditions that according to Freire, lead to increased human suffering? How is society structured in such a way that maintains a system of inequality between the oppressors and the oppressed? How does the education system also suffer in such a society? And finally, what does Freire propose that we do about the situation? How can the conditions of the oppressed be improved? What is needed for more equality? And how does Freire understand the possibility of liberation and freedom for both individuals and groups? Most importantly, do you agree or disagree with Freires ethical theory? And can you apply Freires ideas about ethics to the world today?
(Use examples from the text to support your arguments).
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more