Revisit the case study you selected, but view it through the lens of the entire [Place an Order for this with]

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable ratesFor This or a Similar Paper Click To Order NowRevisit the case study you selected, but view it through the lens of the entire semester. That is, present a thorough review of the case study you select, conceptualized using constructs from throughout the entire semester.For example, Susan Smith was assigned as a case study, as a juxtaposition to Andrea Yates. You could select Susan Smith and discuss personality constructs (antisocial traits, borderline traits), malingering concerns, competency & sanity MSO concerns, risk and dangerousness, etc. For the case you select, feel free to review as many constructs from the semester which pertain to the case as you think are relevant.This assignment is purposefully ambiguous and open-ended. You are being asked to demonstrate your mastery of material from throughout the semester to a case study.Please note that there is a minimum required word count; emphasis on the word ‘minimum’. Meeting the minimum word count will meet the minimum grade. Do not be bound by the word count; the word count is a minimum. Write to a degree that you think you have sufficiently exhausted constructs which are relevant to the case you select. things that l put when l did the caseFacts in a case are the actual occurrence evident in the scenario. The following facts are evident in the case of Colin Ferguson. The murder happened in a Long Island Rail Road train carrying commuters’ homes. On December 7th, 1993, the incident occurred at 5:133 pm on the train heading to Hicksville from New York City. As the train was nearing Nassau County, one of the commuters Colin Ferguson from Jamaica, aged 36, rose and marched unhappy on the passageway shouting everybody he approved. He was using a 9mm gun. Frightened passengers struggled him down when he had paused to reload. More than 19 people were killed and several injured.Pro se gives someone the right to appear in court on their behalf without an attorney. Colins Ferguson was competent to go for pro se since he was conversant with the nature of the legal accounts contrary to him. Also, he could contribute to his defense in court. Moreover, he too distinguished right from wrong at the shootings (Colins Ferguson Trial, 1995). Additionally, Ferguson was mentally able, as declared by Nassau County District Judge Ira Warshawsky. Colins also did not cooperate with Falanga, who was to defend him on the ground of insanity. Ferguson’s actions were triggered by hatred for Caucasians; this was evident in the notes found in his pockets. Furthermore, he rejected the assumption that he was mentally unsound. The above behaviors by Colins proved that he was competent and went for pro se.In the case of Colin Ferguson, it is evident that he was unable to defend himself in a meaningful way. He lacked the competence to act as attorney general. He had trust issues and could not evaluate the advice offered. Moreover, many people cannot defend themselves, interfering with the defense’s conduct.For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order NowRelated
Our Panel of writers are waiting for you to place an order so that they can start working on it immediately.
We have assisted numerous students in the past; please check out our customer reviews.

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more