Why don’t ethical arguments rely on empirical methods? The Limitations of Ethical Arguments: Understanding the Role of Empirical Methods.

The Limitations of Ethical Arguments: Understanding the Role of Empirical Methods.

Ethical arguments are those that rely on moral principles and values to assess the acceptability of an action. However, these arguments rarely employ empirical methods to support their claims. This is because of the subjective nature of ethics and the limitations of empirical research. The first limitation of ethical arguments is that they rely on the subjective interpretation of moral principles. While empirical methods can provide concrete evidence, ethical arguments rely primarily on personal interpretation of moral standards. As such, the same ethical argument can be interpreted differently by different people depending on their values and beliefs (Gill, 2019). This makes it difficult to draw concrete conclusions from ethical arguments. The second limitation of ethical arguments is that empirical research has its own limitations. Empirical research can provide evidence to support an argument, but it does not take into account the moral implications of an action. For example, the empirical evidence may support the use of a particular medicine, but this does not take into account the ethical implications of the medicine, such as the potential harm to vulnerable populations (Kerby, 2016). As such, empirical research alone cannot provide a complete understanding of the. Cont…